Search

Chizuru Watanabe

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
112 matches · 64W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
176 of 266
OR · 4.0
321 of 498

Chizuru is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams44 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chizuru has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chizuru has gone from the 34th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
48.6%
17W–18L · 50.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
68.7%
46W–21L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-07-26 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Hughes
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Hughes
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Paul Yi / Shanna Chuachamps
2026-07-11 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Doubles · with Tommy Trakoolthai
0.055below expectation — took 0% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · with Tommy Trakoolthai
+0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nate Look
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danica Lee
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nate Look
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-10 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Fryman
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Soucy
0.051below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · WHRC-Thayer/Adcock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyoko Adcock
0.047below expectation — took 42% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · WHRC-Thayer/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyoko Adcock
0.017below expectation — took 54% of games against 61% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · WHRC-Thayer/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyoko Adcock
+0.029better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.