WHRC-Thayer/Adcock

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85

Kayleen Mendenhall

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.84

Claire Thayer

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.77

Kristi Vargas

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.67

Rebecca Jones

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4

3.66

Megan Cooper

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4

3.64

Chizuru Watanabe

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.63

Erika Finrow

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4

3.60

Heidi Wilcox

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.54

Robby Lafleur

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.54

Sue Harrison

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.50

Judith Kobin

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Kayleen Mendenhall

95W–65L career

0%97%3%

3.85

Claire Thayer

136W–67L career

0%98%2%

3.84

Kristi Vargas

82W–131L career

1%99%0%

3.77

Rebecca Jones

65W–61L career

4%96%0%

3.67

Megan Cooper

9W–17L career · type S

7%93%0%

3.66

Chizuru Watanabe

64W–48L career

7%93%0%

3.64

Erika Finrow

45W–25L career

19%79%2%

3.63

Heidi Wilcox

86W–87L career

12%88%0%

3.60

Robby Lafleur

53W–48L career

28%72%0%

3.54

Sue Harrison

49W–37L career

27%73%0%

3.54

Judith Kobin

90W–95L career

32%68%0%

3.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.