Search

Megan Soucy

Beaverton, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 22W–39L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 4.0
18 of 42
OR · 4.0
307 of 498

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 47.6% of games
4.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.3% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 47.8% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-05-02 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Kopack
0.020below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maureen Dugan
+0.048better than expected — took 44% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chizuru Watanabe
0.051below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Female Doubles · with Marina Rubinshteyn
0.058below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0
W
2026-03-15 · #1 Female Doubles · with Anna Reutin
0.033below expectation — took 55% of games against 66% expected
6-5
W
Lauren Pennington / Kelly Bakerchamps
2026-03-06 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Doubles · with Catherine Hu
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kate Colbert / Erika Delgadochamps
2026-03-05 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Doubles · with Marina Rubinshteyn
0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Violeta Franco / Olga Regalchamps
2026-03-05 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Doubles · with Catherine Hu
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Annabella Madrigal / Faye Leverman
2026-03-01 · LOTC-Keomanivanh/Rubinshteyn · #1 Female Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Kahler
0.033below expectation — took 67% of games against 73% expected
6-3
W
2026-02-28 · PT&E/SJRC-Lee · #1 Female Singles · 9.0
+0.091better than expected — took 67% of games against 32% expected
6-3
L
2026-02-22 · PT&E/SJRC-Lee · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathryn Stockbower
+0.035better than expected — took 33% of games against 27% expected
6-3
L
2026-01-30 · LOTC-Keomanivanh/Rubinshteyn · #1 Female Singles · 8.0
0.063below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.