← Search

Kristin Taylor

PORTLAND, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 71W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristin Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-07-15 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Polizois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Matt Simmering championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Matt Simmering championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Ellen Mader championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Polizois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mayla Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ellen Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-29 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ellen Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Female Doubles · with Lindsey Kahler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
W
2026-03-13 · #1 Female Doubles · with Ellen Mader championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
L
2026-03-08 · PTC-Rand · #1 Female Singles · 8.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 60.1% of games
4.5
38.9%
14W–22L · 44.4% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.1% of games
8.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.4% of games
9.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova