← Search

Paige Polizois

BEAVERTON, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 65W–46L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Paige Polizois to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Emilee Plank championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilee Plank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Clinton Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Clinton Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Plank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-12 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-23 · LOTC-Taylor/Ferrer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 61.6% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 30.8% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 24.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
22%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Female Singles
13%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova