N OR-LOTC-Taylor

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—

Nick Buckley

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5

—

Nicole Partch

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5

4.32

Paige Polizois

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5

4.16

Mayla Morgan

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5

4.13

Cassia Carpio

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5

4.11

Ellen Mader

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5

4.09

Matt Simmering

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5

4.06

Bradley Sumoge

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5

3.92

Kristin Taylor

usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5

3.89

Joshua Goddard

usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5

3.79

Zach Bergthold

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Nick Buckley

15W–15L career

not enough data

—

Nicole Partch

88W–37L career

not enough data

—

4.5

Paige Polizois

61W–38L career

0%96%4%

4.32

4.5

Mayla Morgan

74W–28L career

2%98%0%

4.16

4.5

Cassia Carpio

255W–90L career

2%98%0%

4.13

4.5

Ellen Mader

97W–47L career

3%97%0%

4.11

4.5

Matt Simmering

104W–61L career

4%96%0%

4.09

4.5

Bradley Sumoge

83W–48L career

8%92%0%

4.06

4.5

Kristin Taylor

49W–39L career

31%69%0%

3.92

4.5

Joshua Goddard

74W–48L career

43%57%0%

3.89

Zach Bergthold

40W–47L career

1%98%1%

3.79

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.