WHRC-Taylor

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32

Paige Polizois

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5

4.11

Kerstin Anderson

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5

3.92

Kristin Taylor

usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5

3.84

Kirsten Giacomini

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.63

Radu Tudorache

usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4

3.54

Robby Lafleur

published 4

3.54

Jaime Perez

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.50

Colleen Docktor

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5

3.46

Rich Rice

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.29

Ben Lauritsen

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

3.28

Neville Mehta

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Paige Polizois

61W–38L career

0%96%4%

4.32

4.5

Kerstin Anderson

112W–83L career

2%98%0%

4.11

4.5

Kristin Taylor

49W–39L career

31%69%0%

3.92

Kirsten Giacomini

93W–48L career

0%96%4%

3.84

Radu Tudorache

39W–34L career

7%93%0%

3.63

Robby Lafleur

53W–48L career

28%72%0%

3.54

3.5

Jaime Perez

36W–24L career

0%73%27%

3.54

3.5

Colleen Docktor

35W–26L career

0%81%19%

3.50

Rich Rice

65W–70L career

46%54%0%

3.46

3.5

Ben Lauritsen

62W–45L career

0%99%1%

3.29

3.5

Neville Mehta

112W–80L career

0%99%0%

3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.