Search

Tara Hendrickson

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
136 matches · 71W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
112 of 266
OR · 4.0
214 of 498

Tara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams72 teams · 2003–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tara has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tara has gone from the 96th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
71.4%
45W–18L · 60.4% of games
4.5
25%
7W–21L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games
8.0mixed
45.9%
17W–20L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-07-26 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/Amixed
2026-06-26 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Singles
0.041below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles
0.014about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.004about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Jen McDaneld
2026-06-12 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.071below expectation — took 33% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.122better than expected — took 86% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-16 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.020below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.