← Search

Tina Farrelly

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 125W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tina Farrelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-08-08 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-07 · GLVR-Kopack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Eggerts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · ACB-Hit Happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cate McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · ACB-Hit Happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · GLVR-Kopack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Shin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · GLVR-Kopack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Eggerts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-03 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Vendegna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Putsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Stromquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
84.4%
54W–10L · 64.1% of games
4.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
80%
20W–5L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal