Search

Fiona Tait

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
145 of 399
OR · 3.5
297 of 735

Fiona is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Fiona has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Fiona has gone from the 88th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 57.4% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.4% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Lennox
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lang
0.040below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Johnson
+0.017about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parish Burns
+0.032better than expected — took 54% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hanson
+0.070better than expected — took 68% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Ericka Nelson / Winnie Woo
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marjorie Saine
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lang
0.014about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lang
+0.044better than expected — took 83% of games against 58% expected
5-1
W
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Gray
+0.021better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lang
+0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Fisher
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Marie Hajduk / Maureen Hendersonchamps
2025-10-25 · #4 Doubles · with Lauren Larsen
+0.021better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.