← Search

Carly Vendegna

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 68W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carly Vendegna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-05-31 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Farrelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-30 · Vendegna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-26 · Vendegna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Cowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-24 · Vendegna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariana White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-07-09 · Vendegna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Cowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-21 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Farrelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-11-04 · GLVR-McIntosh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle McGovern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-10-22 · GLVR-McIntosh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Bracken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-10-14 · GLVR-McIntosh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Singson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-10-07 · GLVR-McIntosh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Singson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.2% of games
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.9% of games
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 61.7% of games
4.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 41.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer