← Search

Tami McAra

Boring, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 149W–117L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tami McAra to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history266 matches
W
2026-09-13 · CAC-McAra · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Zielinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · CAC-McAra · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CAC-McAra · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · CAC-McAra · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · CAC-Ramsey/Shaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · CAC-McAra · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Stockbower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · CAC-Ramsey/Shaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roksolana Shyyka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · CAC-Ramsey/Shaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Jobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · CAC-McAra · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · CAC-McAra · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
95.2%
20W–1L · 65.5% of games
4.0
52.2%
60W–55L · 49.9% of games
4.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 38.8% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
67.5%
27W–13L · 57.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
28W–28L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#1 Singles
12%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal