← Search

David Greenberg

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 89W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Greenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with May Albano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Morgan Towle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-08 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Farrelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Powers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · Deuce Crackerjacks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Ruhmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Deuce Crackerjacks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with May Albano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with John Jay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with John Jay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with John Jay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Powers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-05-31 · NOR-PTC-Greenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
82.4%
42W–9L · 67% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.4% of games
8.0mixed
67.4%
29W–14L · 55.6% of games
9.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams