Teams

N OR-PTC-Greenberg

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Travis Friedrich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Jason Ruhmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Agus Rusli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Michael Jung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Ken Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Scott Powers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
David Greenberg
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Vincent Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Marc DeSantis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Brad Ouderkirk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.56
Chris Collins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Travis Friedrich
37W–20L career
0%95%5%
3.90
4
Jason Ruhmann
110W–52L career
0%95%5%
3.89
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Michael Jung
66W–37L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Ken Nichols
123W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Scott Powers
74W–26L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
David Greenberg
84W–40L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Vincent Lee
136W–76L career
5%95%0%
3.69
4
Marc DeSantis
56W–37L career
11%88%0%
3.64
4
Brad Ouderkirk
70W–47L career
16%84%0%
3.58
4
Chris Collins
113W–56L career
23%77%0%
3.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.