Teams

GLVR-Kopack

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Mark King
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
Jason Ruhmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Michael Jung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kristen Kopack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Scott Powers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
May Albano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Angie Stromquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Carrie Putsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Morgan Towle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
David Greenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Tina Farrelly
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Brad Ouderkirk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mark King
93W–54L career
0%97%3%
3.90
4
Jason Ruhmann
110W–52L career
0%95%5%
3.89
4
Michael Jung
66W–37L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Scott Powers
74W–26L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
May Albano
62W–50L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Angie Stromquist
92W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.75
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–48L career
1%98%0%
3.75
4
Morgan Towle
59W–54L career
1%99%0%
3.73
4
David Greenberg
84W–40L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–43L career
8%92%0%
3.62
4
Brad Ouderkirk
70W–47L career
16%84%0%
3.58

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.