Search

Elsa Oestermarker

Portland, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 20252026
Where Elsa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Elsa is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elsa has been a steady 5.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.55.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history12 matches
W
Sansriti Ranjan / Lauren Skelly
2026-06-22 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lucy Erickson
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lucy Erickson
+0.036better than expected — took 44% of games against 32% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tracy Gagnon
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · PTC-James · #1 Female Singles · 9.0
0.091below expectation — took 33% of games against 68% expected
6-3
W
2026-02-14 · PTC-James · #1 Female Singles · 9.0
0.038below expectation — took 75% of games against 80% expected
6-2
W
2026-02-07 · PTC-James · #1 Female Singles · 9.0
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-5
L
Amanda Pruitt
2026-01-17 · PTC-James · #1 Female Singles · 9.0
0.093below expectation — took 25% of games against 65% expected
6-2
L
Kaitlin Burns / Doug Postmixed
2025-11-22 · PTC-James · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ezra James
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kaitlin Burns / Doug Postmixed
2025-10-26 · PTC-James · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Fanelli
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-15 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.003better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-07 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.018better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-03-30 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.054better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.