Search

Matt Fanelli

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
71 matches · 33W–38L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 4.0
95%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
45 of 119
OR · 4.5
88 of 226

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Matt has gone from the 16th to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
48.1%
25W–27L · 52.2% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Issei Saida
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Cano
+0.028better than expected — took 44% of games against 34% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Cano
+0.048better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Kinderknecht
+0.014better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Alex Hart / Shane Adam Young
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Kinderknecht
0.023below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Jeff Yeom / Jameson Lumpkin
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Cano
+0.015about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
James Luu / Simon Collischamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Josh Greene
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Saril Valiyaparambil
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Greene
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Chart
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Cano
0.039about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Ryley Schultz
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Jonathan Haukaas / John Bard
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Greene
+0.038better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.