Search

Josh Greene

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 34W–25L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 4.0
98%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
39 of 119
OR · 4.5
70 of 226

Josh is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Josh has been a steady 4.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Josh has gone from the 73rd to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.5
62.8%
27W–16L · 55.6% of games
9.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelly Mohr
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
James Luu / Simon Collischamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Matt Fanelli
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Saril Valiyaparambil
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Fanelli
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Jonathan Haukaas / John Bard
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Fanelli
+0.038better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Fanelli
+0.026better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Sackmann
0.119about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Darci Keljo / Martin Batsmixed
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Gagnon
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Gagnon
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jason Qian / Sansriti Ranjanmixed
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Gagnon
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paige Dahlman
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.