Search

Austin Jou

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
56 matches · 11W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
58%
down to 4.0
42%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 35% down · 65% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.03. Higher than today’s 3.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
88 of 119
OR · 4.5
165 of 226

Austin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
SAC-Tippisetti
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2026
SAC-Tippisetti
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2026
SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2025
PTC-Borosky
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2025
SAC-Furuya/Dewolf
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2024
SAC-Jou
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Austin has been a steady 4.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Austin has gone from the 19th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.5
19.6%
11W–45L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
Eddie Schultz / Bryan Laing
2026-05-23 · SAC-Tippisetti · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Shih
+0.030better than expected — took 45% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · SAC-Tippisetti · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · SAC-Tippisetti · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Richard Shih
0.010below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-06 · SAC-Tippisetti · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.003about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-01-31 · SAC-Tippisetti · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.032below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-09 · SAC-Tippisetti · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Augusto Carneiro
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Tan Nguyen
2025-05-24 · SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Jordan Burns / Daniel Burns
2025-05-18 · SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Furuya
+0.045better than expected — took 62% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-05-10 · SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.026better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Tan Nguyen
2025-04-27 · SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Tony Lam
2025-04-20 · SAC-Tippisetti/Furuya · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.015about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Eddy Rodriguez
2025-03-08 · PTC-Borosky · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.023below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.