Search

Tracy Gagnon

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
39 matches · 23W–16L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 4.0
91%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.12. Higher than today’s 4.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
54 of 119
OR · 4.5
104 of 226

Tracy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
PTC-James
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2026
PTC-James
2026 Coed 18-39 · 9.0 Coed Combo
2026
2nd Breakfast
2026 One Doubles · 5.0 Women
2026
GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
CAC-McGarity
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2024
PTC-Farris/Gagnon
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tracy has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tracy has gone from the 29th to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.3% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
100%
5W–0L · 67.4% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-07-16 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amanda Jensen
0.020below expectation — took 30% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elsa Oestermarker
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · PTC-James · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Maura Mannix
0.005about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3
W
2026-02-14 · PTC-James · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Paige Dahlman
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2
W
2026-01-31 · PTC-James · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Lucy Erickson
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3
W
2026-01-25 · PTC-James · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Paige Dahlman
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3
W
Khang Chu / Amanda Pruitt
2026-01-17 · PTC-James · #1 Mixed Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Fanelli
+0.022better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
5-3
W
Darci Keljo / Martin Batsmixed
2025-11-22 · PTC-James · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Josh Greene
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-15 · PTC-James · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Josh Greene
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Amy Juppenlatz Sweet / Ken Schwerdmixed
2025-10-26 · PTC-James · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kris Cohen
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Jason Qian / Sansriti Ranjanmixed
2025-10-04 · PTC-James · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Josh Greene
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-06-15 · GLVR-Farris/Bilstrom · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Dahlman
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.