← Search

Amanda Jensen

Portland, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 58W–22L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amanda Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-16 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tracy Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-03 · 2nd Breakfast · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lucy Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · NOR-PTC-Kowalewski · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Katelyn Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-11 · NOR-PTC-Kowalewski · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Wakana Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-23 · PTC-James · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ezra James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · PTC-James · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kyle Kinderknecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-04 · PTC-James · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Juan Presichi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-28 · PTC-James · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Juan Presichi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-17 · #1 Doubles · with Hanna Jensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Sharon Bellusci / Sarah Kelly
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Wakana Turner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-31 · The Jensen Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanna Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-07-25 · The Jensen Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanna Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 71.3% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 61.9% of games
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.4% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.9% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams