Teams

The Jensen Sisters

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-31vs TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen vs Kristin Taylor / Mayla Morgan7-6, 6-1
2025-07-25vs Ferrer/Berkman-Grab My Strong PawWon 10
W#1 DoublesHanna Jensen / Amanda Jensen vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman6-3, 6-3
2025-07-18vs Taggart-Summer FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen vs Tamara Justus / Jennifer Benedict6-2, 6-1
2025-07-17vs Ferrer/Berkman-Grab My Strong PawLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman3-6, 2-6
2025-06-27vs N OR-DuongWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen vs Michelle Ly / Alyssa Mah6-1, 7-5
2025-06-26vs Mehr/HarringtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesHanna Jensen / Amanda Jensen vs Cate Harrington / Michelle Mehr6-0, 6-3
2025-06-19vs Green-ZwemkeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Ellen Mader6-1, 6-1
2025-06-12vs TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesHanna Jensen / Amanda Jensen vs Emilee Plank / Hannah Plank6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Jensen Sisters7171239
2N OR-Duong7171342
3Ferrer/Berkman-Grab My Strong Paw4444868
4Taggart-Summer Fun44441179
5Green-Zwemke17171491
6Mehr/Harrington08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Amanda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.12
Hanna Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hanna Jensen + Amanda Jensen17366% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Jensen
58W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.56
4.5
Hanna Jensen
47W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.