Teams

Mehr/Harrington

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Michelle Mehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Kristen Kopack
published 4
Results8 ties
2025-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Mehr / Kristen Kopack vs Mary Bullard / Mary Green-Zwemke6-3, 6-2
2025-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Kopack / Michelle Mehr vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman6-3, 6-0
2025-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Mehr / Cate Harrington vs Hannah Plank / Paige Polizois6-2, 7-6
2025-07-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Mehr / Cate Harrington vs Jennifer Benedict / Sydney Taggart7-6, 6-3
2025-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Mehr / Carrie Engle vs Yen Ly / Alyssa Mah6-3, 6-1
2025-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCate Harrington / Michelle Mehr vs Hanna Jensen / Amanda Jensen6-0, 6-3
2025-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Mehr / Carrie Engle vs Tarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer6-3, 6-2
2025-06-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCate Harrington / Michelle Mehr vs Annie Duong / Alyssa Mah6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Michelle Mehr
22W–46L career
24%76%0%
3.97
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.