← Search

Alix Edwards

Lake Oswego, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 139W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Alix Edwards to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
W
2026-08-09 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hector M Salomon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · NOR-Buchman · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Link
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcus Kroloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · NOR-Buchman · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Allison Buchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hector M Salomon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · NOR-Buchman · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Link
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Allison Buchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Allison Buchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amy Juppenlatz Sweet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sarah Ferrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-07 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shane Adam Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 67.1% of games
4.5
81.1%
43W–10L · 62.4% of games
5.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 66.3% of games
9.0mixed
70.7%
29W–12L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal