← Search

Asim Hafeez

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 85W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Asim Hafeez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
Amy Foley / Craig Pearce
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Kristen Benkstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Teresa Sullivan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Teresa Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Teresa Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelly Mohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tamara Justus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Teresa Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · NOR-LOTC-Shull · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Oberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · THPRD-Rankin/Shull · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rich Redfern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · THPRD-Rankin/Shull · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luke Filose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · THPRD-Rankin/Shull · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Corey Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-3
L
2026-04-04 · THPRD-Rankin/Shull · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rich Redfern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 61.5% of games
4.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams