← Search

Josh Schweitz

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 89W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Josh Schweitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-08-09 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christie Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yen Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-24 · NOR-LCC-Schweitz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christie Post mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Borosky · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Owen Suagee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Borosky · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eugene Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-3
W
2026-04-11 · PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Owen Suagee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · N OR-PTC-Borosky · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arthur Kowitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Jared Lewis - (DQ)* / Issei Saida
2026-03-07 · N OR-PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arthur Kowitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · N OR-PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Sackmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · N OR-PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Tammen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 60.2% of games
5.0
31%
9W–20L · 45.4% of games
10.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games
9.0mixed
81.4%
35W–8L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King