LOTC-Shull/Rankin

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—

Marcus Eyth

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5

4.32

Asim Hafeez

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

4.26

Lisa Grant

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.17

Amanda Solomon

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.16

Luke Filose

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5

4.15

Christina Oberg

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.09

Tracey Riddle

published 4.5

4.00

Tamara Justus

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5

3.84

Kristen Benkstein

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.84

Teresa Sullivan

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.77

May Albano

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.59

Kelly Mohr

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Marcus Eyth

11W–27L career

not enough data

—

4.5

Asim Hafeez

82W–59L career

0%95%5%

4.32

4.5

Lisa Grant

41W–32L career

0%96%4%

4.26

4.5

Amanda Solomon

138W–71L career

1%99%0%

4.17

4.5

Luke Filose

106W–43L career

1%99%0%

4.16

4.5

Christina Oberg

94W–30L career

1%98%0%

4.15

4.5

Tracey Riddle

52W–22L career

3%97%0%

4.09

4.5

Tamara Justus

98W–68L career

16%84%0%

4.00

Kristen Benkstein

132W–55L career

0%99%1%

3.84

Teresa Sullivan

110W–57L career

0%98%2%

3.84

May Albano

62W–50L career

1%99%1%

3.77

Kelly Mohr

114W–55L career

11%89%0%

3.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.