← Search

Whitney Palfreyman

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Whitney Palfreyman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-07-12 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Kopack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Strange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-24 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Buxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 50.5% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 34.8% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King