Teams

N OR-MAC-Duong

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.46 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Annie Duong
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
published 4.5
4.14
Mariniah Prendergast
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.07
Cynthia McPhee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.06
Stacy Hawkins Parker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.03
Christie Post
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Amy Leahy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Elise Anderson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Lisa Handley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Whitney Palfreyman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.84
Brooke Burnett
published 4.5
3.79
Heidi Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Annie Duong
120W–52L career
0%71%29%
4.46
4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
4.5
Mariniah Prendergast
52W–33L career
3%97%0%
4.14
4.5
Cynthia McPhee
38W–30L career
9%91%0%
4.07
4.5
Stacy Hawkins Parker
58W–55L career
8%92%0%
4.06
4.5
Christie Post
29W–26L career
10%90%0%
4.03
4.5
Amy Leahy
73W–57L career
24%76%0%
3.96
4.5
Elise Anderson
84W–81L career · type A
51%49%0%
3.86
4.5
Lisa Handley
41W–32L career
52%48%0%
3.86
4
Whitney Palfreyman
25W–37L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4.5
Brooke Burnett
23W–27L career · type A
55%45%0%
3.84
4.5
Heidi Clark
42W–52L career
67%33%0%
3.79

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.