Teams

LOTC-Wu/Shull

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Phalkun Mam
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.44
Erin Link
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Jameson Lumpkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Asim Hafeez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Sue Gregoire
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Kimberly Quach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Xia Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Teresa Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Halle Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Justin Shull
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Jamie Slonaker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Kelly Mohr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Phalkun Mam
44W–29L career
not enough data
4.5
Erin Link
109W–77L career · type A
0%78%22%
4.44
4.5
Jameson Lumpkin
69W–31L career
0%94%6%
4.32
4.5
Asim Hafeez
82W–59L career
0%95%5%
4.32
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Kimberly Quach
109W–96L career
26%74%0%
3.94
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
32%68%0%
3.93
4
Teresa Sullivan
110W–57L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Halle Jackson
122W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.84
4
Justin Shull
133W–38L career
1%99%0%
3.73
4
Jamie Slonaker
84W–78L career
3%97%0%
3.67
4
Kelly Mohr
114W–55L career
11%89%0%
3.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.