Search

Rudd McGarity

Gresham, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
98 matches · 33W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
100%
down to 4.0
0%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 92% down · 8% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.89. Higher than today’s 3.79 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.5
221 of 226

Rudd is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams97 teams · 2002–2027
CGM-Bos/Zielinski
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2027
CAC-McAra
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2027
CAC-McGarity
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men
2027
CAC-Morales/Lee
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
N OR-CAC-McGarity
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men
2026
NOR-CAC-McGarity
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rudd has been a steady 4.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Rudd has gone from the 26th to the 46th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 53.2% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
12.5%
3W–21L · 40.3% of games
9.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-19 · CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Cunningham
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Lisa Grant / Greg Boudreaumixed
2026-07-03 · CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Krissy Wyngarden
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · with David Sturdyvin
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jeffery Urie / Kevin Joneschamps
2026-06-26 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti
0.070below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Alix Edwards / Hector M Salomonmixed
2026-06-21 · CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Danielle Cuenco
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · with Justin Greene
+0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jeff Yeom / Jim Rankin
2026-06-07 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Tinsley
0.025below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Greene
0.026below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Oberg
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heidi Affentranger
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cindy Nordlund
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Corey Kincaid
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.