Search

Lisa Grant

White Salmon, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
73 matches · 41W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
53 of 364

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams62 teams · 2003–2026
LOTC-Shull/Rankin
2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2026
MPRC-Cronk/Morris
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
EW-IND-Ihde
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 WOMEN
2026
THPRD-Graham/Ly
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
MPRC-Cronk/Morris
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
EW-IND-Ihde
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 5.0, 4.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

4.04.55.0201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Lisa has gone from the 80th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 56.7% of games
5.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 31.1% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-07-05 · LOTC-Shull/Rankin · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Greg Boudreau
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-03 · LOTC-Shull/Rankin · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Greg Boudreau
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Dagney Markle / Rachel Ayers
2026-04-18 · EW-IND-Ihde · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sally Anderson
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jill Rowland / Yukiko Lutz
2026-04-18 · EW-IND-Ihde · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sydney Ihde
+0.069better than expected — took 71% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Zanna Orvald / Rebecca Stewart Rust
2026-04-17 · EW-IND-Ihde · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with JENNIFER BELOY
+0.052better than expected — took 72% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · EW-IND-Ihde · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with JENNIFER BELOY
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · EW-IND-Ihde · #1 Doubles · with Carianne Nieuwstraten
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · MPRC-Cronk/Morris · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten Ruchaber
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · MPRC-Cronk/Morris · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten Ruchaber
+0.040better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-02-13 · MPRC-Cronk/Morris · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carianne Nieuwstraten
0.023below expectation — took 47% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Erica Mitchell
+0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Sandra Andrews
0.048below expectation — took 38% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.