MPRC-Cronk/Morris

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26

Lisa Grant

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.13

Sarah Morris

usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5

4.12

Sue Gregoire

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.11

Kerstin Anderson

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5

4.10

Kirsten Ruchaber

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5

4.08

Liz ODonnell

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.04

Michelle Donato

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5

3.97

Krissy Wyngarden

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5

3.94

Chiho Cronk

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5

3.92

Janet Tabor

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

3.77

Danielle Cuenco

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Lisa Grant

41W–32L career

0%96%4%

4.26

4.5

Sarah Morris

85W–38L career

3%97%0%

4.13

4.5

Sue Gregoire

120W–80L career

2%98%0%

4.12

4.5

Kerstin Anderson

112W–83L career

2%98%0%

4.11

4.5

Kirsten Ruchaber

55W–37L career

4%95%0%

4.10

4.5

Liz ODonnell

56W–24L career

6%94%0%

4.08

4.5

Michelle Donato

106W–70L career

9%91%0%

4.04

4.5

Krissy Wyngarden

46W–30L career

21%79%0%

3.97

4.5

Chiho Cronk

92W–68L career

29%71%0%

3.94

4.5

Janet Tabor

51W–28L career

36%64%0%

3.92

Danielle Cuenco

89W–55L career

1%99%0%

3.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.