← Search

David Tinsley

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 59W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Tinsley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jeb Hubbs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jeremy Morris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jeb Hubbs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Morris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rudd McGarity
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · NOR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Crumpacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-15 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
80%
36W–9L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.1% of games
9.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams