← Search

Craig Williams

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
79 matches · 40W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
60%
down to 4.0
40%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 36% down · 64% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.03. Higher than today’s 3.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
89 of 119
OR · 4.5
166 of 226

Craig is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Craig has been 4.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.5201920202022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Craig has gone from the 28th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 48.2% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 61.1% of games
9.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cassia Carpio
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Wakana Turner / Dean Gaylormixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kerstin Anderson
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
+0.000below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Eddy Rodriguez
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Tseng
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Redding
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
−0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Redding
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.029below expectation — took 59% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Redding
−0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Yuko Hopman
−0.033below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Yuko Hopman
−0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.