Search

Lisa Black

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
123 matches · 85W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
23 of 103
WA · 4.5
67 of 364

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Lisa has gone from the 50th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
66.2%
45W–23L · 60.5% of games
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 63.6% of games
9.0
100%
6W–0L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Mindy Blakeslee
+0.023better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Mindy Blakeslee
0.049below expectation — took 65% of games against 77% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alex Rosen
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Emily Pelosi / Elise Johnson
2026-04-17 · STC-Andrews · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lauren Hummel
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Holmes
+0.009better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-29 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cordova
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jane McQuade / Jim Madsenchamps
2026-03-14 · STC-The Holmes Team · #3 Doubles · with Alex Rosen
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Anne Luke / Earl Allenchamps
2026-03-14 · STC-The Holmes Team · #3 Doubles · with Alex Rosen
0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Cheryl Hicks / Jonathan Holzmanchamps
2026-03-13 · STC-The Holmes Team · #3 Doubles · with Alex Rosen
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edie Hall
0.019below expectation — took 46% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Blakeslee
+0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-13 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Holmes
0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.