← Search

Elizabeth Fletcher

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
93 matches · 50W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
99%
down to 4.0
1%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 91% down · 9% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Higher than today’s 3.80 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
101 of 103
WA · 4.5
354 of 364

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Elizabeth has gone from the 5th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 57.9% of games
4.0
80%
24W–6L · 58.7% of games
4.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
L
Allison Porter / Lisa Brougham
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Eichenlaub
−0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janine VanderWhitte
+0.008about as expected — took 28% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Jackie Vandenberg / Tatyana Keney
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Campbell Traywick
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Kylie Choi / Laurie Ono
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chutimont Blacksmith
−0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Stiefel
−0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Stiefel
+0.014about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chutimont Blacksmith
−0.020below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Campbell Traywick
−0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jill Leedom / Brooke Cordova
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Bursiek
+0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Stiefel
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Stiefel
+0.021about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenny Dire
−0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.