← Search

Kerri Hatfield

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 20W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kerri Hatfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-06-06 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grace Bethards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with SuHyun Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
W
2026-03-13 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fosseen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with SuHyun Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Huong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-13 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Stephanie May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-07 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Lonergan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-01-24 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-11 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-30 · MI-Net Cords Nemesis-Jawed · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-02 · MI-Net Cords Nemesis-Jawed · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fosseen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.9% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer