Search

Shannon Fosseen

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
141 matches · 75W–66L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
90%
stay 4.0
10%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.84. Lower than today’s 3.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
1 of 45
WA · 4.0
55 of 840

Shannon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams67 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Shannon has gone from the 5th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 58.8% of games
4.5
40.9%
18W–26L · 42.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
61.8%
21W–13L · 55.5% of games
9.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-07-18 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nickolay Tchervenski
+0.000below expectation — took 59% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Mike Wilson / Teresa Morrowmixed
2026-07-11 · AYTC-Ballers-Czeisler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Richards
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vamsi Surapaneni
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · AYTC-Ballers-Czeisler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Richards
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie May
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diane Tien
0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 2-2
W
2026-03-13 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Hatfield
+0.008about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Emily Barrett / Katie Hambley
2026-01-03 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with SuHyun Jung
+0.020better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Jessica Blakeslee / Cameron Coemixed
2025-10-26 · MIBC-Barrett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jevin West
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · TCSP-Lach In! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Han
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Bond Minard / Iyengo Andrew-Jajamixed
2025-10-19 · TCSP-Lach In! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Lachenmaier
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.