← Search

Lisa Debiec

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 59W–151L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Debiec to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Felicia van Pelt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felicia van Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Borberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-27 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Perlman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · EDG-Volley Llamas-Debiec · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bally Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felicia van Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-3
L
2026-07-16 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felicia van Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-11 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wesley Lew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-05 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · EDG-Volley Llamas-Debiec · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Richard Deitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Felicia van Pelt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
26.7%
23W–63L · 38.4% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.8% of games
9.0
30%
3W–7L · 44.8% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
15W–30L · 44% of games
9.0mixed
24.5%
12W–37L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
58 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova