← Search

Felicia van Pelt

Issaquah, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 38W–47L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Felicia van Pelt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-11 · EDG-Kilambi · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Debiec championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Moawad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Moawad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-21 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-3
L
2026-07-16 · Have Some Fun-Van Pelt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Debiec championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Debiec championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teena Griggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Moawad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · NWW-EDG-Debiec · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Moawad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
75%
24W–8L · 59.1% of games
4.5
31%
9W–20L · 42.7% of games
4.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.8% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#1 Singles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams