← Search

SuHyun Jung

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 48W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add SuHyun Jung to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Bita · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Bita · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-05-17 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Huong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · MI-Fosseen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-01-31 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Tintle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-24 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 56.9% of games
4.5
47.2%
34W–38L · 48.6% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#1 Singles
18%
17 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert