Search

Huong Pham

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
86 matches · 42W–44L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 4.0
90%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.12. Higher than today’s 4.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.5
7 of 17
WA · 4.5
168 of 364

Huong is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Huong has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Huong has gone from the 67th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
44.6%
25W–31L · 49.2% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Wendy Mounger
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Brooke Cordova
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Brooke Cordova
0.056below expectation — took 38% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Marissa Encarnacion / Kelly Nolan
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
+0.034better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grace Bethards
0.017better than expected — took 86% of games against 79% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Kim Evans / Tatyana Keney
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with SuHyun Jung
+0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kerri Hatfield
+0.007about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jill Leedom / Brooke Cordova
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kitty Flaherty
0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
Sheryl Brown / Dayna Guizzetti
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tessie Decker
+0.036better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.