← Search

Sarah Newman

Edmonds, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
113 matches · 64W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
96 of 364

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Sarah has gone from the 27th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
58.5%
31W–22L · 53.8% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.8% of games
9.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche
−0.015about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Rutter
−0.034below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Bouche
+0.056better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anya Dalkin
+0.013better than expected — took 72% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Beardslee
−0.015better than expected — took 80% of games against 75% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Damien David / Amy Hsumixed
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Christopher Elliott / Lauren Kuanmixed
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche
−0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Anya Dalkin
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Rutter
−0.044below expectation — took 67% of games against 77% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche
+0.049better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.