← Search

Diana Nickel

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 72W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diana Nickel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
L
2026-08-09 · BC-Vegarra · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pablo Bernal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-08-01 · BC-Vegarra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Vegarra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Kaci Okumoto championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-29 · NTC-M-at-N-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loan Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · NTC-M-at-N-Lao · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Min
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-18 · NTC-M-at-N-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loan Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loan Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kaci Okumoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loan Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anh Lao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina la Porta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-01-18 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
75%
21W–7L · 60.6% of games
4.5
60%
27W–18L · 51.8% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 51.2% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer