Search

Alicia Miller

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
131 matches · 74W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
70%
down to 4.0
30%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 44% down · 56% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.01. Higher than today’s 3.96 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
78 of 103
WA · 4.5
278 of 364

Alicia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alicia has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Alicia has gone from the 48th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
66.1%
39W–20L · 56.9% of games
4.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.4% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
L
Kelly Nolan / Carmen Dolfo-Garrison
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Romeu
+0.026better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Romeu
0.004about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Katie Lacayo-hendricks / Terra Yara
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Romeu
+0.043better than expected — took 58% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Barrett
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Janine VanderWhitte / Dana Campbell Traywick
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Selma Adilagic
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Klein
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Adkisson
+0.039better than expected — took 40% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madeline Thiesse
+0.013about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madeline Thiesse
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madeline Thiesse
+0.026better than expected — took 54% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Kimberly Aigner / Michelle Leonatti
2025-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madeline Thiesse
+0.039better than expected — took 46% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Julie Hansen / Christine Yang
2025-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with August Carow
0.026below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.