Search

Selma Adilagic

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
116 matches · 63W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
8%
down to 4.0
92%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.13. Higher than today’s 4.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
50 of 103
WA · 4.5
159 of 364

Selma is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Selma has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Selma has gone from the 44th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 64% of games
4.5
44%
33W–42L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.3% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susannah Thompson
+0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-25 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.087better than expected — took 71% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Katelyn Hoang
2026-05-01 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.020better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 1-1
L
Margaux Steele
2026-04-12 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Ellie Chapman
2026-04-04 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.020below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-01 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Kirsten Morrison
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.031better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 3-1
L
Janine VanderWhitte / Dana Campbell Traywick
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alicia Miller
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyri Khouri
0.048below expectation — took 50% of games against 68% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.