← Search

Suzanne Eichenlaub

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 127W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Eichenlaub to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-08-07 · NWW-TCSP-Lao · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tam Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Sure Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Campbell Traywick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · Sure Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Campbell Traywick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · Eichenlaub · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · Sure Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · NWW-TCSP-Lao · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tam Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Fletcher · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chutimont Blacksmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · TCSP-Fletcher · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina la Porta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Eichenlaub · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-02-08 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kaila Yun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-25 · NTC-KFC-Lao · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina la Porta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
94.4%
17W–1L · 66% of games
4.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 53% of games
4.5
39.5%
17W–26L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer