← Search

Bridget Rodden

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 82W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bridget Rodden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-07 · NWW-AYTC-Czeisler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Ball mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-08-07 · AYTC-M55-Czeisler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Ball mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · AYTC-Bagels & Grits40+ Sherr · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Rodden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · NWW-AYTC-Czeisler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jevin West mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · NWW-AYTC-Czeisler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Ball mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Rodden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 63.1% of games
4.0
56%
42W–33L · 53.4% of games
8.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer