Search

Brant Lyerla

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
43 matches · 14W–29L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
89 of 199
WA · 4.0
374 of 840

Brant is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brant has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brant has gone from the 43rd to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Walker
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Johnson
+0.000better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Brooke Gilbert / Ethan Chungmixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
JON COOMBES / Gulliver Swenson
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Froslan
0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Ng
+0.038better than expected — took 45% of games against 32% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Charles Oliver / David Jacob
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Scher
0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Griff
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Froslan
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Garry Murayama / John Maciejewski
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Bilsborough
+0.072better than expected — took 80% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Griff
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalie Pryde
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Helen Chiang / VINAY Kumarmixed
2025-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Rentschler
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.